Describing
Recommendations and District/Campus Improvement Initiative/Action Research
Lessons Learned
The experiences
that I was afforded in Spring Branch have shaped me as a leader and allowed for
me to think more globally about the work that I do on a daily basis. The three problems that I addressed for this
assignments are not only areas of struggle in my district but dimensions that
people struggle with across the state, and I truly believe that we are on the
right path to solving some of the problems in a positive and student friendly
way.
I first
discussed the upcoming implementation of House Bill 5. This has been a wonderful piece of
legislation that opens doors and avenues for students that might have been
closed before. Although student
friendly, there are still several questions for schools and districts regarding
its interpretation and implementation.
In SBISD, we are working to have conversations regarding graduation
plans, course sequencing, endorsements, certifications, and how it overall ties
into our district goal. These
conversations have lead to several documents, which help to provide clarity,
insight and innovation into a system that was dry and lifeless before. Teachers are more energized, and I believe
that in our upcoming course selection, you will see more students choosing the
courses that they want with purpose than ever before, which will validate the
work being done.
The second
issue that I chose to address is our System of Care initiative. The System of Care was created because we
were wasting millions of dollars a year suspending students who needed to be in
classrooms. In addition, the number of Hispanic
and African American students being suspended was extremely weighted compared
to all other students. The system of
care was designed to look at positive behavior reinforcement practices that
could help shift the mentality of students being sent home to finding ways to
celebrate students who were still in school.
In addition, the initiative provides more resources to schools with a
greater need than others. Since the
initial implementation in October, the committee has seen a 50% decrease in the
number of students who have any form of in-school or out-of-school suspension
as well as attendance rates improving.
We hope to continue to move on this trajectory and spend the money saved
on additional resources for the students of greatest need.
Finally,
the district single focus goal of T-2-4 might be our greatest challenge
yet. The challenge to be held
responsible for student's years after they leave the system was one that had
people fearful at first, however; all adults in the system are beginning to
believe and invest in this program and our initial data points returned two
years in show that we have had a 15% increase in the number of students
completing some form of higher education, and that the interest and awareness
of students as a whole has significantly increased. Educators are proud of the work that they are
doing and this pride is resonating through the students. SBISD is 20 points above the state college
completion average and we hope to continue on an upward trajectory for years to
come.
As you can
see, although we have great challenges ahead of us, I am proud of the work that
we are doing in Spring Branch and I look forward to watching the system grow
over the years.
Jen I would love to hear more about the positive behavior program and the results you are seeing. As a small school we continue to get hit on PBMAS for special population rates in ISS and OSS from behavior. We are trying to change the culture and some behaviors require immediate attention and mandatory DAEP placement. We have begun trying alternative methods from ISS and OSS this semester and have begin to see some positive results I wonder if your ideas would work where I am.
ReplyDeleteJennifer,
ReplyDeleteThank you for sharing your reflections on this week's assignment. Would love to hear more about your "System of Care" initiative going on in SBISD. In my research thus far, discipline issues at the secondary level typically stem from discipline issues at the elementary and middle school levels. Additionally, many discipline issues have been linked to social class. Some researchers have suggested that many students from poverty are unfairly discipline because their white middle class teachers (typically the case) do not understand the culture of poverty, and thus, wrongfully discipline students. Is this something that is part of the training? Have you seen evidence that would support these research findings?
Would love to hear your thoughts, and thank you for your thoughts!
-Mike